SD-WAN vs. SDN

Software-defined Networking (SDN) concepts and the OpenFlow protocol were introduced in 2011 to deliver increased agility, flexibility, operational efficiency and choice to data networking. Fundamental to SDN was the separation or disaggregation of the control or management function (plane) from the data forwarding function (plane) of the network. SDN proposed centralizing control while leaving the data forwarding function distributed amongst network elements (switches and routers).
The SD-WAN architectural model is similar to SDN in many ways:
  • Centralized management or orchestration – the control plane
  • Distributed data forwarding function – the data plane
  • Application-driven traffic routing policies
SD-WAN, similar to SDN solutions, do not support interoperability between vendors. However, various SDN and SD-WAN industry working groups continue to propose and debate the creation of industry standards.

SD-WAN delivers value to enterprises of all sizes

In contrast, SD-WAN vendors focused on delivering production-worthy WANs and providing value to enterprises of all sizes. SD-WAN interoperability efforts focused on working with existing WAN infrastructure such as routers, firewalls and transport services and not on multi-vendor SD-WAN solutions.

SD-WAN delivers a tangible ROI

SD-WAN is being rapidly adopted in production by companies of all sizes and in all industry verticals because it delivers an easily attainable, tangible ROI. As of the second half of 2018, SD-WAN has moved beyond the early adopter market acceptance phase to the early majority, with more than 10,000 production SD-WAN deployments industry-wide.

Also Read : tech support salary

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

cloud managed switch

what does a network switch do

ms access switches